Field notes · a digital field book by Joost van der Zwan
Designing software behavior in the age of AI.
Progress stays in this browser.

Fig. 0 · One response, timed
TPA · Home
01 · One framework from the book
Negotiated Software Loop
Fig. 1 · One pass through the loop
- Intent (Person): The user arrives with a goal, often only partially specified; the product treats it as intention, not always as complete instruction.
- Interpretation (System): The system forms a working understanding from the request, context, defaults, history, and available data.
- Suggestion (System): The system proposes an output, action, classification, draft, or next step, framed according to confidence and stakes.
- Review (Person): The user evaluates whether the suggestion fits the goal, context, and consequences.
- Delegation (Person): The user hands the system bounded work to carry out: what it may touch, how far it may go, and when it must stop and ask. Optional; when it happens, the grant is as legible as the suggestion.
- Report back (System): The system returns an account of what it did, skipped, assumed, and could not undo; for delegated work, the report is the review surface.
- Correction (Person): The user edits, rejects, redirects, accepts, or clarifies what the system produced.
- Adaptation (System): The system changes what it does next based on the correction; the change may be temporary, durable, or global.
Each correction changes the next interpretation. Circles are your decisions; squares are what the system does.
Describes the new contract between user and machine in probabilistic systems: intent, interpretation, suggestion, review, delegation, report back, correction, adaptation.
- 01
Intent
The user arrives with a goal, often only partially specified; the product treats it as intention, not always as complete instruction.
- 02
Interpretation
The system forms a working understanding from the request, context, defaults, history, and available data.
- 03
Suggestion
The system proposes an output, action, classification, draft, or next step, framed according to confidence and stakes.
- 04
Review
The user evaluates whether the suggestion fits the goal, context, and consequences.
- 05
Delegation
The user hands the system bounded work to carry out: what it may touch, how far it may go, and when it must stop and ask. Optional; when it happens, the grant is as legible as the suggestion.
- 06
Report back
The system returns an account of what it did, skipped, assumed, and could not undo; for delegated work, the report is the review surface.
- 07
Correction
The user edits, rejects, redirects, accepts, or clarifies what the system produced.
- 08
Adaptation
The system changes what it does next based on the correction; the change may be temporary, durable, or global.
The Product Architect · Frameworks
Fig. 1 · 4 / 15
02 · The arc
Six stages. Fifteen chapters.
Swipe for all six stages
The Product Architect · Contents
Stages I–VI · — / 15
03 · One behavior
An invoice can look clean before the product has earned that claim.
The extracted fields look plausible. The purchase order names a different supplier. New bank details cross company policy. The product still has to decide whether to prepare, route, hold back, or act.
The short experiment separates evidence quality, measured reliability, permission, consequence, and recovery—the decisions a polished summary can hide.
Fig. 2 · INV-20418
INV-20418
- Supplier
- PO match
- Amount
- Bank account
- Due
Changed since last invoice
New bank details cross company policy. The product still has to decide.
The Product Architect · Case
Fig. 2 · Invoice review
04 · Author and practice
The work connects product judgment to the system a team can build.
If you are shaping workflow-heavy B2B software and the hard question is how the product should behave, write to Joost or inspect the evidence behind this project.
Interfaces show. Behavior decides. I design how software behaves.
Field notes on Instagram: Studio JZ • Design, Behavior & Science.
Follow on Instagram
This is for the builder who reads the system through the screen.
- 01
You can see the product decision inside a workflow before anyone names it.
- 02
You care about what the system should notice, remember, refuse, and recover from.
- 03
You care about the screen because it reveals what the system permits.
Newsletter · monthly
One Field Note a month.
What changed in the book, the latest episodes, one framework in practice.
Opens a message to joost@studio-jz.nl in your email app. Send it to subscribe.